mate vs xfce

Out of the box XFCE is pretty bare but there are all kinds of themes that you can install, it is very customizable. Like Mate, Xfce is primarily for older hardware which many have issues with the demands of Cinnamon. Gnome 3 > Safa, pero es muy “mobile” a lo WIndows 8, no es de mi agrado para uso personal, con el tiempo fue madurando y mejoraron el consumo de recursos, si … I've had only two issues: Bluetooth integration doesn't work (this is a known problem), and panel sometimes doesn't autohide (it happened in GNOME 2 as well). It reminds me very much of Linux distros of years past. Mate feels like Gnome 2 feels: old. En ubuntu hay PPA para todo, en debian eso no existe. Xfce: Ve výchozím nastavení používá gtk, tradiční rozvržení, ale velmi přizpůsobitelné, velmi lehké. En honor a la verdad xfce y MATE/Gnome 2 son muy parecidos, ambos se basan en GTK y comparten grna número de programas, de hecho es realmente fácil hacer que un escritorio xfce sea identico a un escritorio a un escritorio MATE. Teniendo una buena máquina, entre esos 3 que nombraste me quedo con Mate.-. GNOME2/MATE look more polished than XFCE in my opinion. It is worth noting that MATE misses some of the newer features that are available in Cinnamon. I might have to look into that. Laptop specs: amd A6 1.5ghz quad core 4gb ddr3 1066mhz 500gb hd 1366x768 display, Linux based operating systems I have used: Arch linux mint 12 lxde & 13 with cinnamon and xfce Ubuntu 11.10 & 12.04 Fedora 17 gnome 3 Opensuse 12.1 Backtrack 5. The project only added user-friendliness as its goal around 2006. Xfce desktop is very light and customizable, so I expect that you will fit well to it. Esto sig… by josealb77 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:22 pm, Post by The Dark Side » Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:52 pm, Post XFCE feels much better than Mate, IMO. Default Desktop Environment KDE, GNOME and XFCE (more with Community Editions) Init-System systemd. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. Parece que olvidé poner KDE, lo usé hace mucho tiempo y no era tan estable, no para principiantes, pero: José Manuel cuando dices. It’s up to you to decide which one you would like to prefer. Even a few years after that, Xfce hadn't completed the simple, user-friendly task of adding a desktop launcher. by The Dark Side » Thu Mar 07, 2013 4:07 pm, Post Beberapa tahun yang lalu saya membuat spreadsheet yang membandingkan fitur-fitur lingkungan desktop. A este grupo pertenecen Mate, XFCE, Cinnamon y LXDE. Best thing is to install both, and try them out. Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. It's not necessarily bad, but some people prefer the other approach. MATE. El mejor entorno de escritorio Lean Linux LXDE Vs Xfce Vs MATE Para algunos usuarios de Linux, el rendimiento es el rey. I want to open LibreOffice in 1 freakin' second (I'm in Lubuntu 20.04 right now and … Mate: Es gnome2 estable de toda la vida, escritorio que he usado por mas tiempo. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Choose Linux Mint Mate or Cinnamon or XFCE or KDE ? The only thing I miss about gnome2 is the system monitor panel applet that showed everything in a graph. Is there still a lot of development for Mate? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. canela vs mate vs kde vs xfce. What I want to know is: Is it lightweight? Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. It is fast, easy, and simple. Selecting among these two is very difficult. It runs and looks great. Xfce vs. MATE. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard introduces 7 popular Linux desktop environments and shows their pros and cons. Like Mate, Xfce generally lives up to its self-description. It offers a desktop environment for every user. LXDE is a minimalistic desktop environment, somewhat like Windows XP in look and feel. I set it up as testing machine and, allbeit a bit slow by today's standard, it's actually totally usable and no way near an annoying experience. What I want to know is: Is there still a lot of development for Mate? Go for XFCE, or LXDE, which is even more lightweight. Lamedición se ha realizado teniendo en cuenta una situación muyclara. Respuesta 1: Yo era un usuario de Windows. El propósito de esta comparativa es ayudar a los principiantes a decidir qué escritorio usar, teniendo en cuenta requisitos de hardware, aspecto visual, características generales y facilidad de uso. The kernel has nothing to do with the desktop environment you use. Laptop specs: amd A6 1.5ghz quad … XFCE, LXQT don’t offer fancy animations and icons but they’re popular among developers. The Best Lean Linux Desktop Environment: LXDE vs. Xfce vs. MATE Tweaking your choice of Linux desktop environment can speed things up a lot. I believe there's an xfce applet to use old gnome panel applets, although I'm not sure if it's still maintained. In addition, Xfce still shows signs of its more geeky past. Post Linux Mint Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE vs KDE It knows what fullscreen is, how to handle more than one monitor, and also uses less resources than the other gnome-ish DE's. Hi everyone, This post is about Linux Mint MATE and XFCE, specifically about which is faster and uses less RAM. It is a desktop environment best suited for those looking for a traditional, seamlessly working desktop. However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. ram. Is it customization? This is … Estimados: Si los vamos a medir en terminos de estabilidad, sin lugar a dudas que Mate es, sin lugar a dudas el mas estable de estos 3 escritorios que mencionan. Last night I took a 7 year old HP laptop and put Arch on it with XFCE as my desktop environment after having installed a similar setup in a virtual box last week. Cómo completo y funcional, también les diria que Mate es mas completo y funcional que los otros dos. This will probably be a fairly short post, because most of the detail is in the video. Jawaban 1: Saya adalah pengguna windows. It is designed to run on legacy hardware which requires a desktop environment that has minimal system requirements. Tampoco hay que negar que hay aplicaciones para Gnome muy buenas, en mi caso prefiero usar las aplicaciones multimedia de Gnome que las KDE. Para ello, prefiero MATE, tan estable como Gnome 2. Here we look at three options: LXQt, Xfce, and MATE. Main Usage Desktop which recent packages that are slightly longer tested than in Arch. It is easy to switch back and forth. KDE consume bastante memoria y recursos de sistema, pero si tenés una máquina medianamente actual, lo va a correr bien. 0 Bugs ni problemas de ningún tipo, ni bajo rendimiento y además es muy completo y funcional: nunca he echado de menos ninguna función, cosa que sí me ha pasado en LXDME, XFCE, Gnome, Cinnamon, etc. Saya mencoba menemukan Lingkungan Desktop yang terlihat dan bertindak seperti windows. So I am thinking about installing Linux mint Debian for my laptop and am unsure if I want to try Mate or use xfce. by nestoriano » Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:34 pm, Post Official Supported Architectures x86-64 (AMD64) Currently, I am using MATE. Install everything and each alternative window manager for a day. Pero KDE realmente es hermoso, por donde se lo mire.-. Also, how can you say that XFCE is more current when they used the same GTk version for development? Todos ellos son completos, aunque no igual de personalizables. Sin embargo es el mejor escritorio que existe hoy por hoy en Linux, altamente configurable y personalizable.- Tanto KDE cómo Cinnamon consumen mas memoria y mas recursos de sistema que Mate o XFCE. Todays Linux Mint distributed under the 32 bit and 64 bit version with different desktop environment version such as Cinnamon, Mate, KDE, and XFCE. Cómo completo y funcional, también les diria que Mate es mas completo y funcional que los otros dos. by juansantiago » Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:50 pm, Post Mate > Me quedo con XFCE, más liviano, no está mal pero sería bueno que unieran fuerzas con XFCE. They've bloated it (I use barely more RAM in KDE than XFce 4.12 needs and it's as fast as Xfce), they haven't added any real functionality, and it's still buggy. However, it does NOT come with several key packages built-in that I think many new users would expect. It runs a a webserver and I even use gimp on it as well for a bit of casual image editing. by nestoriano » Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:13 pm, Post En primerlugar, y antes de entrar al ranking dedistribuciones Linux debajo consumo como tal, hay quedecir que todas ellas consumen menos de 1 GB dememoria RAM. Estaba tratando de encontrar un entorno de escritorio que se parezca y actúe de manera muy similar a Windows. When I say 'Xfce,' it’s a good bet you think about a lean, responsive Linux desktop environment that’s particularly light on system memory usage. Linux can be customized to a great extent. by juansantiago » Thu Mar 07, 2013 4:24 pm, Post He probado Mint con Mate y con Xface, respecto a Mete ninguna duda, me gusta definirlo así: tiene algunas cosas superfluas que te facilitan la vida y es muy estable, también e probado xface en máquinas con pocos recursos y ahora en dos núcleos dos gigas ram. XFCE vs LXDE - Cuál es mejor para mí. Mate vs XFCE. Long story short: Between MATE and Xfce, I'd choose Xfce. More lightweight also means "has fewer functions", which means you have to "explicitly" install lots of stuff. It is a very bare-bone, minimalist desktop environment. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Just out of curiosity, what makes you say MATE is going backward? by rebhecca » Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:19 pm, Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited. MATE: Blízko Xfce, je to moderní reinkarnace GNOME 2 poté, co se GNOME přesunul do úplně jiného GNOME 3. by rop75 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:15 pm, Post Estimado juansantiago: Sí, el problema que siempre tuvo KDE es que necesita una máquina medianamente potente para desplegar todo su potencial. I'm using MATE on my laptop at the moment. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. MATE is not Lightweight Desktop. Fedora 24: Comparing Gnome, KDE Plasma, Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce, LXDE. Antes de usarlo no tenía claro cuál era mi escritorio preferido, ahora no tengo ninguna duda. When you need to install the Linux Mint which one you should choose? I don’t know fully the extent or specifics of all these environments but I have tried all of them. A few years ago I would have suggested Xfce over Mate for speed but ever since Xfce 4.12 came out I rescind that. Prefiero MATE. I'm a little partial to MATE, being an Ubuntu user since Hoary. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. Mi voto va para xfce. by l0ad » Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:49 am, Post La interfaz gráfica se llama Cinnamon ( canela en inglés ), no Sinnamon. Cinnamon, el escritorio por … Mate is better sorted. Before continuing with the comparison between the XFCE, the GNOME 3 and the KDE, it should be clear for experts that we can’t touch the MATE desktop as an option in the comparison. Todos somos muy ignorantes. Mate es muy maduro, muy estable, en cuanto a consumo de recursos está parejo con Xfce (creo que Xfce consume menos recursos, aunque por poco margen). Hace unos años hice una hoja de cálculo … Some people don't know the differences between various Linux desktop environments and they may ask questions like Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE. by juansantiago » Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:27 pm, Post by hatteras » Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:37 pm, Post With the final release of Fedora 24 arriving on Tuesday, I've installed each of the six desktops on a different laptop or netbook. Also try KDE and the gnome-shell. Mate is based on Gnome, so it's not going to be nearly as light as xfce. A fork of GNOME 2, MATE had its latest stable release 1.22 on March 18th, 2019 (as of October 2019). Pero no todos ignoramos las mismas cosas. See which works best for you. Xfce is a lightweight 2D desktop environment designed for better performance on older hardware. A review of MATE, Xfce, LXDE, LXQt, Budgie, Lumina, and Moksha. Again, with LXQt vs MATE, the primary different again comes down to Qt vs GTK+. cinnamon vs mate vs kde vs xfce. Linux Mint 20: Cinnamon VS Mate VS XFCE : Which one is SNAPPIER? Xfce my friend, I was forced to switch desktop environment because of Unity, which in my particular case, I don't like. Xfce makes use of lesser resources, but its benefits come to light when you will be download and run the apps which depend on GNOME. XFCE is moving forward, while MATE is going backward. Use XFCE y MATE, pero no me convencieron mucho. Teniendo una buena máquina, entre esos 3 que nombraste me quedo con Mate.- First things first, these are all desktop environments that you can download on whatever distro you are using. Las opciones propuestas son muchas, pero válidas para un recién llegado a linux son pocas. Si eres de los que buscan un entorno de escritorio ligero para tu sistema Linux, tal vez te sientas un poco abrumado al buscar por internet. Enfrentamos a los cuatros escritorios que se ofrecen por defecto en Linux Mint: KDE, MATE, XFCE, y Cinnamon. I would say XFCE is the better choice. What kind of apps do you prefer? Ya sea que estén usando una computadora vieja y lenta y que solo necesiten sacar el máximo provecho de ella, o si estén usando un sistema nuevo de alto rendimiento y quieran dedicar todo ese poder a la tarea en cuestión Mantener todo lo más delgado posible es la clave. So I am thinking about installing Linux mint Debian for my laptop and am unsure if I want to try Mate or use xfce. Igual cada quien usa lo que mejor le parece y se adapte a sus necesidades, y las mías las llena de sobra KDE como entorno de escritorio. Lo recomiendo, es estable, completo y sencillo. GNOME, Unity, KDE, MATE DE’s are suitable for the users who are using Linux for everyday tasks such as web-browsing, listening to music, watching videos, etc. Openbox serves as a very different function than XFCE or MATE. Es la llamada de “uso real”, es decir, con el ordenador iniciado y Firefox, la terminal y el gestorde archivos funcionando.En teoría, estos tres programasdeberían consumir lo mismo siempre. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. If you prefer Qt software and you want a lighter desktop, then LXQt is a no-brainer. With that computer, I don't think performance is going to make any significant difference for either, but I think XFCE is slightly lighter than Mate. This is done on request by someone who watched my Linux Mint 19 MATE Review video from three months ago. Out of the box, MATE has a few more bells and whistles than Xfce, but it's also a little less customizable. I run a six-core desktop with a lot of video power and RAM just because the environment stays out of the way of other programs when it needs to. I'm not sure if Mate was still a bit buggy compared to gnome 2 when I last tried it (pretty recently), or if I've just grown to like XFCE a whole lot more than I used to. MATE comes with more features than Xfce. Also, it follows a slower development schedule compared to Cinnamon. Xfce vs MATE. I run xfce/xubuntu on a 2004 laptop, 1.3mhz with 500Mb (!) Prefiero el Linux Mint en su versión, mate. Ahora, si tu máquina ya tiene algunos años o es muy vieja ni se te ocurra meterle KDE porque te va a andar como una tortuga. Cinammon: Používá gtk, tradiční rozvržení, používá 3D efekty mnohem více než Xfce a MATE. GNOME 2 was the thing to use at the time - clean, sleek and cool. by josealb77 » Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:00 pm, Post Se puede adaptar el repositorio a cambio de perder estabilidad por meter cosas que no fueron hechos para el. The kernel will be updated as you get updates from your distro's repo, or if you choose to update the kernel manually. What about when I … Mate es muy maduro, muy estable, en cuanto a consumo de recursos está parejo con Xfce (creo que Xfce consume menos recursos, aunque por poco margen). Go here to see the post associated with that video. La comparativa se ha realizado en un netbook, el Samsung NC10, en el cual han ejecutado ese entorno de pruebas en las últimas versiones de los cuatro entornos de escritorio/gestores de ventanas más populares en la actualidad: GNOME 2.29.1, KDE SC 4.4.1, LXDE 0.5 y XFCE 4.6.1. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. How can you discover all features/pitfalls in just a few days? However, MATE is faster than Cinnamon, consumes fewer resources, and is more stable, which adds to its popularity. Xfce vs. MATE. I would have to say that you should go with XFCE as well. All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. Linux Mint Cinnamon Vs. MATE: The Visual Differences canela vs mate vs kde vs xfce. Also can the kernel be updated in the same way it could in linux mint and ubuntu? It blows my mind that a 7 year old laptop runs this great with the most up to date software.

Pokemon Red Map, 1965 Chevy Impala Ss 396 4 Speed For Sale, Primal Kitchen Chicken Pesto Review, Nptel Toppers List, Lion Brand Mandala Ombre Yarn Mantra,

Share:
TwitterFacebookLinkedInPinterestGoogle+

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *